Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 8.2 vs 7.4. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.387 vs $0.643. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (low) is faster at 19.47s vs 21.18s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 2.5 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Release: 2025-06-17 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14
Score 8.2 7.4
Rank #31 #70
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 69.7%
Flaky tests 1 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.286 3.514
Total Cost $0.643 $0.387
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.740 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $2.960 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,498 87,673
Output Tokens 12,739 7,166
Reasoning Tokens 228,464 101,474
Response Time (avg) 21.18s 19.47s
Response Time (max) 140.50s 209.15s
Response Time (total) 465.89s 428.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 2.5 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
274.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#70 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

low
Cost
$0.016
Time
47.6s
Tokens
5,182 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 41.01s 6,669 543 32,303
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 24.87s 7,893 402 24,945

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair