- Rank
- #163
- Total Output Tokens
- 121,223
- Response Time (avg)
- 58.14s
- Total Cost
- $2.405
Ember-1 (high) vs Grok 4.6 (low)
Grok 4.6 (low) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.9. Grok 4.6 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.781 vs $2.405. Grok 4.6 (low) is faster at 16.44s vs 58.14s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 66.7%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #159
- Total Output Tokens
- 42,315
- Response Time (avg)
- 16.44s
- Total Cost
- $0.781
Recommended model
Grok 4.6 (low)
It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 3.1x less than Ember-1 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ember-1 Ember-1 high | Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.9 | 6.9 |
| Rank | #163 | #159 |
| Reliability | 8.6 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 66.7% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 20.041 | 5.205 |
| Total Cost | $2.405 | $0.781 |
| Input Price | $3.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $15.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 195,489 | 263,427 |
| Output Tokens | 12,475 | 6,006 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 108,748 | 36,309 |
| Response Time (avg) | 58.14s | 16.44s |
| Response Time (max) | 255.06s | 57.97s |
| Response Time (total) | 1337.19s | 378.14s |
| Parameters | ~2.8T total (~104B active) | ~1.7T total (~170B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#163 Ember-1
high- Cost
- $0.038
- Time
- 55.1s
- Tokens
- 2,671 tok
#159 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
low- Cost
- $0.011
- Time
- 26.0s
- Tokens
- 1,941 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BmediumvsGrok 4.6lowEmber-1highvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumEmber-1highvsGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailableEmber-1highvsGPT-5.6 LunalowClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsEmber-1highClaude Opus 4.8nonevsEmber-1highEmber-1highvsKimi K2.6mediumKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsGrok 4.6lowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6lowEmber-1highvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumvsGrok 4.6lowEmber-1highvsInklinglowFree Available