Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $1.143. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) is faster at 49.75s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#52
Total Output Tokens
168,165
Response Time (avg)
49.75s
Total Cost
$0.041
Rank
#25
Total Output Tokens
169,940
Response Time (avg)
67.53s
Total Cost
$1.143
Recommended model DeepSeek V4 Flash (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 8.4), while costing about 28.5x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.7 8.4
Rank #52 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.2 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.402 8.173
Total Cost $0.041 $1.143
Input Price $0.094 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $0.188 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,392 79,240
Output Tokens 14,478 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 153,687 164,842
Response Time (avg) 49.75s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 1094.41s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#52 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair