Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash

Summary

DeepSeek V4 Flash leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.0. DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.054. DeepSeek V3.2 is faster at 18.25s vs 36.78s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 FlashIt has the strongest score in this comparison (5.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Release: 2026-04-24
Score 5.0 5.6
Rank #165 #143
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 31.8%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.870 0.917
Total Cost $0.054 $0.044
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.098 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.196 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,780 240,221
Output Tokens 42,097 100,727
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 18.25s 36.78s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 247.27s
Response Time (total) 401.60s 809.09s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#143 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair