Navigate
Advertise here

DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.3. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.147. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 12.71s vs 70.08s, with pass rates of 62.3% vs 47.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#221
Total Output Tokens
143,160
Response Time (avg)
70.08s
Total Cost
$0.145
Rank
#213
Total Output Tokens
20,816
Response Time (avg)
12.71s
Total Cost
$0.147
Recommended model Qwen3.6 27B

It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 5.5x faster than DeepSeek V3.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #221 #213
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.5 7.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 62.3% 47.8%
Flaky tests 7 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.250 1.874
Total Cost $0.145 $0.147
Input Price $0.280 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $0.420 / 1M $3.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 306,662 250,919
Output Tokens 17,819 20,816
Reasoning Tokens 125,341 0
Response Time (avg) 70.08s 12.71s
Response Time (max) 376.10s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 1611.86s 292.29s
Parameters 671B total (37B active) 27B
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#221 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

#213 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair