Navigate
Advertise here

Command A+ vs gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b leads on average score with 3.7 vs 3.0. Command A+ has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.033. gpt-oss-120b is faster at 21.61s vs 81.36s, with pass rates of 0.0% vs 33.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-23

Compared models

Rank
#356
Total Output Tokens
0
Response Time (avg)
81.36s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#349
Total Output Tokens
51,664
Response Time (avg)
21.61s
Total Cost
$0.033
Recommended model gpt-oss-120b

It has the best score here (3.7), while responding about 3.8x faster than Command A+.

Detailed comparison

Metric Command A+ Command A+ none Release: 2026-09-23 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b none Release: 2025-08-05 Free Available
Score 3.0 3.7
Rank #356 #349
Reliability 0.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 7.8
Attempts 66/66 57/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 0.0% 33.3%
Flaky tests 0 2
Total Runs 66 57
Cost per result 0.000 0.168
Total Cost $0.000 $0.033
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 0 9,081
Output Tokens 0 51,664
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 81.36s 21.61s
Response Time (max) 106.37s 113.71s
Response Time (total) 1789.98s 345.79s
Parameters 218B total (25B active) 117B total (5.1B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#356 Command A+

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

#349 gpt-oss-120b

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Command A+ 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 80.82s 0 0 0
gpt-oss-120b 1.5 4.0 22.2% 1 9.57s 901 3,232 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair