Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM 5

The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. GLM 5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $0.092. GLM 5 is faster at 4.03s vs 6.85s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 42.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-12

Rank
#187
Total Output Tokens
10,640
Response Time (avg)
6.85s
Total Cost
$0.092
Rank
#189
Total Output Tokens
1,989
Response Time (avg)
4.03s
Total Cost
$0.041
Recommended model GLM 5

It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 2.3x less than Seed 2.1 Turbo.

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed 2.1 Turbo Seed 2.1 Turbo none Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #187 #189
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 42.4%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.014 0.263
Total Cost $0.092 $0.041
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,141 37,135
Output Tokens 10,640 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.85s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 55.92s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 150.66s 56.37s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Seed 2.1 Turbo

none
Cost
$0.093
Time
517.1s
Tokens
37,102 tok

#189 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed 2.1 Turbo 4.5 7.9 22.2% 1 2.35s 8,211 608 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair