Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Seed-2.0-Code leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.1. Qwen3 Coder Next has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.151. Qwen3 Coder Next is faster at 9.12s vs 14.67s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 25.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-12

Rank
#219
Total Output Tokens
23,432
Response Time (avg)
14.67s
Total Cost
$0.151
Rank
#223
Total Output Tokens
11,808
Response Time (avg)
9.12s
Total Cost
$0.026
Recommended model Qwen3 Coder Next

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.3), while costing about 5.9x less than Seed-2.0-Code.

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code none Release: 2026-08-12 Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03
Score 5.3 5.1
Rank #219 #223
Reliability 6.7 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.7
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 25.8%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.503 0.488
Total Cost $0.151 $0.026
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $0.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 159,740 134,218
Output Tokens 23,432 11,808
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 14.67s 9.12s
Response Time (max) 132.84s 45.14s
Response Time (total) 322.75s 145.94s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 80B total (3B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#219 Seed-2.0-Code

none
Cost
$0.030
Time
140.6s
Tokens
9,924 tok

#223 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 3.6 9.8 0.0% 0 13.42s 7,230 505 0
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair