Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code vs Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.3. Kimi K2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.101 vs $0.151. Seed-2.0-Code is faster at 14.67s vs 18.03s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 30.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#228
Total Output Tokens
23,433
Response Time (avg)
14.67s
Total Cost
$0.151
Rank
#223
Total Output Tokens
26,643
Response Time (avg)
18.03s
Total Cost
$0.101
Recommended model Kimi K2.5

It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code none Release: 2026-08-12 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27
Score 5.3 5.4
Rank #228 #223
Reliability 8.6 10.0
Consistency 8.1 8.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 30.3%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.503 2.278
Total Cost $0.151 $0.101
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $2.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 159,749 89,320
Output Tokens 23,433 26,643
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 14.67s 18.03s
Response Time (max) 132.84s 102.83s
Response Time (total) 322.71s 288.42s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 1T total (32B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#228 Seed-2.0-Code

none
Cost
$0.030
Time
140.6s
Tokens
9,924 tok

#223 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 3.6 9.8 0.0% 0 13.42s 7,230 505 0
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair