Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (medium) vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)

GPT-5 Nano (medium) leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. GPT-5 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.114 vs $0.792. GPT-5 Nano (medium) is faster at 54.87s vs 84.96s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#150
Total Output Tokens
1,002,646
Response Time (avg)
84.96s
Total Cost
$0.792
Rank
#143
Total Output Tokens
273,098
Response Time (avg)
54.87s
Total Cost
$0.114
Recommended model GPT-5 Nano (medium)

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 6.9x less than Trinity Large Thinking (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking medium Release: 2026-07-28 GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #150 #143
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 56.1%
Flaky tests 7 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 11.308 1.267
Total Cost $0.792 $0.114
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,477 94,935
Output Tokens 148,823 12,042
Reasoning Tokens 853,823 261,056
Response Time (avg) 84.96s 54.87s
Response Time (max) 525.14s 227.89s
Response Time (total) 1869.16s 822.99s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#150 Trinity Large Thinking

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
75.9s
Tokens
19,401 tok

#143 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 7.5 10.0 66.7% 0 179.02s 7,248 7,413 351,155
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair