Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.2. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the lower benchmark cost at $0.122 vs $0.548. Claude Sonnet 5 is faster at 6.05s vs 7.09s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-21

Compared models

Rank
#206
Total Output Tokens
22,508
Response Time (avg)
6.05s
Total Cost
$0.548
Rank
#202
Total Output Tokens
80,341
Response Time (avg)
7.09s
Total Cost
$0.122
Recommended model MiMo-V2.6-Pro

It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 4.5x less than Claude Sonnet 5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5 none Release: 2026-06-30 MiMo-V2.6-Pro MiMo-V2.6-Pro none Release: 2026-09-22
Score 6.1 6.2
Rank #206 #202
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 45.5%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.817 1.353
Total Cost $0.548 $0.122
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 161,032 119,156
Output Tokens 22,508 80,341
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.05s 7.09s
Response Time (max) 33.39s 106.86s
Response Time (total) 132.99s 155.92s
Parameters ~1T total (~100B active) 1.02T total (42B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#206 Claude Sonnet 5

none
Cost
$0.061
Time
53.7s
Tokens
6,172 tok

#202 MiMo-V2.6-Pro

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
14.8s
Tokens
2,260 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 3.67s 10,590 1,864 0
MiMo-V2.6-Pro 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 3.69s 7,440 4,344 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair