Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) vs Muse Ember (high)

Muse Ember (high) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 9.2. Muse Ember (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.156 vs $8.557. Muse Ember (high) is faster at 11.67s vs 84.26s, with pass rates of 82.6% vs 79.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-10

Compared models

Rank
#41
Total Output Tokens
758,707
Response Time (avg)
84.26s
Total Cost
$8.557
Rank
#36
Total Output Tokens
254,892
Response Time (avg)
11.67s
Total Cost
$0.156
Recommended model Muse Ember (high)

It has the best score here (9.2), while costing about 55.0x less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max Release: 2026-09-29 Muse Ember Muse Ember high Release: 2026-11-09
Score 9.2 9.2
Rank #41 #36
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.4 9.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.6% 79.7%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 47.536 0.865
Total Cost $8.557 $0.156
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M $0.004 / 1M
Cache Write Price $2.500 / 1M $0.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 484,627 282,192
Output Tokens 11,026 14,054
Reasoning Tokens 747,681 240,838
Response Time (avg) 84.26s 11.67s
Response Time (max) 488.39s 53.01s
Response Time (total) 1937.91s 268.45s
Parameters ~1T total (~100B active) ~150B total (~10B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#41 Claude Sonnet 5.5

max
OpenRouter returned no showcase content (finish_reason: length).
Cost
$0.000
Time
571.7s
Tokens
0 tok

#36 Muse Ember

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
18.3s
Tokens
9,965 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 55.26s 10,608 580 70,730
Muse Ember 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.62s 7,410 1,213 34,691

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 MAXmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017lowSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsMuse EmberhighClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsMuse WondermediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsMuse Spark OpenhighClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsMuse EmberhighClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsMuse Spark 1.3highMuse EmberhighvsGPT-5.5mediumMuse EmberhighvsGPT-6.1 Terralow