- Rank
- #39
- Total Output Tokens
- 727,349
- Response Time (avg)
- 83.04s
- Total Cost
- $7.545
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (high)
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) leads on average score with 9.0 vs 8.9. Muse Spark 1.3 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.653 vs $7.545. Muse Spark 1.3 (high) is faster at 52.49s vs 83.04s, with pass rates of 81.8% vs 77.3%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #44
- Total Output Tokens
- 359,608
- Response Time (avg)
- 52.49s
- Total Cost
- $1.653
Recommended model
Muse Spark 1.3 (high)
Its score stays close to the best score here (8.9 vs 9.0), while costing about 4.6x less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max | Muse Spark 1.3 Muse Spark 1.3 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Rank | #39 | #44 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 81.8% | 77.3% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 44.380 | 10.327 |
| Total Cost | $7.545 | $1.653 |
| Input Price | $2.000 / 1M | $1.250 / 1M |
| Output Price | $10.000 / 1M | $4.250 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 135,496 | 99,143 |
| Output Tokens | 8,153 | 12,083 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 719,196 | 347,525 |
| Response Time (avg) | 83.04s | 52.49s |
| Response Time (max) | 488.39s | 251.53s |
| Response Time (total) | 1826.84s | 1154.76s |
| Parameters | ~1T total (~100B active) | ~1T total (~50B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#39 Claude Sonnet 5.5
max
OpenRouter returned no showcase content (finish_reason: length).
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 571.7s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#44 Muse Spark 1.3
high- Cost
- $0.050
- Time
- 203.3s
- Tokens
- 11,679 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.39s | 858 | 397 | 3,109 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.71s | 618 | 487 | 8,829 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 55.26s | 10,608 | 580 | 70,730 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 51.66s | 7,275 | 1,228 | 64,287 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 113.57s | 97,957 | 5,219 | 95,067 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 55.55s | 68,737 | 5,707 | 46,328 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 16.07s | 10,515 | 312 | 10,487 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.01s | 7,155 | 491 | 6,758 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 401.38s | 990 | 19 | 485,043 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 174.56s | 690 | 801 | 114,774 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 33.3% | 1 | 56.66s | 714 | 322 | 20,156 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.49s | 477 | 228 | 2,634 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 8.5 | 6.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 6.24s | 921 | 98 | 2,263 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 14.70s | 669 | 353 | 10,553 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.17s | 912 | 578 | 3,186 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 88.9% | 1 | 38.42s | 651 | 1,178 | 37,874 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 41.40s | 11,757 | 354 | 12,232 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 9.6 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 33.95s | 12,688 | 1,046 | 14,673 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 47.01s | 264 | 274 | 16,923 | |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 140.05s | 183 | 564 | 40,815 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 MaxmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumMuse Spark 1.3highvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumMuse Spark 1.3highvsParetononeClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGrok 4.5highClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumMuse Spark 1.3highvsQwen3.8 MaxmediumMuse Spark 1.3highvsGPT-5.5mediumGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsMuse Spark 1.3high