Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite

Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.234 vs $2.057. Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) is faster at 25.91s vs 48.53s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 74.2%.

Recommended modelSeed-2.0-Lite (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 8.8x less than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-17 Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Release: 2026-02-14
Score 7.8 7.9
Rank #47 #42
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 74.2%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 14.692 1.669
Total Cost $2.057 $0.234
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,292 129,897
Output Tokens 80,748 12,533
Reasoning Tokens 35,117 88,047
Response Time (avg) 25.91s 48.53s
Response Time (max) 140.96s 254.92s
Response Time (total) 362.78s 1067.74s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#47 Claude Sonnet 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#42 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
86.7s
Tokens
2,354 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.7 6.6 44.4% 1 33.29s 6,995 16,089 3,686
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair