- Rank
- #100
- Total Output Tokens
- 120,427
- Response Time (avg)
- 28.08s
- Total Cost
- $2.126
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) vs Seed-2.0-Code (low)
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Seed-2.0-Code (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.767 vs $2.126. Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) is faster at 28.08s vs 72.24s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 77.3%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #106
- Total Output Tokens
- 241,309
- Response Time (avg)
- 72.24s
- Total Cost
- $0.767
Recommended model
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium)
It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 2.6x faster than Seed-2.0-Code (low).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Rank | #100 | #106 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| Consistency | 9.5 | 7.8 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 65.2% | 77.3% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 15.182 | 5.899 |
| Total Cost | $2.126 | $0.767 |
| Input Price | $3.000 / 1M | $0.500 / 1M |
| Output Price | $15.000 / 1M | $3.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 106,316 | 85,657 |
| Output Tokens | 79,338 | 8,142 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 41,089 | 233,167 |
| Response Time (avg) | 28.08s | 72.24s |
| Response Time (max) | 140.96s | 485.92s |
| Response Time (total) | 421.15s | 1589.31s |
| Parameters | ~1T total (~100B active) | ~200B total (~20B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#100 Claude Sonnet 4.6
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#106 Seed-2.0-Code
low
Provider returned error
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.3s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 2.98s | 789 | 1,046 | 1,093 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 8.7 | 7.9 | 91.7% | 1 | 39.56s | 930 | 2,650 | 15,987 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 5.7 | 6.6 | 44.4% | 1 | 33.29s | 6,995 | 16,089 | 3,686 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 7.0 | 7.1 | 55.6% | 1 | 109.70s | 7,948 | 455 | 55,759 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 93.65s | 75,531 | 31,916 | 9,109 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 99.12s | 55,969 | 3,774 | 21,408 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.90s | 8,676 | 649 | 742 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 24.88s | 8,046 | 246 | 1,639 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 58.37s | 495 | 24,380 | 22,891 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 238.45s | 975 | 16 | 132,626 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.94s | 564 | 256 | 433 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 11.14s | 579 | 179 | 1,117 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.61s | 792 | 318 | 552 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.20s | 828 | 72 | 1,034 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.31s | 816 | 592 | 646 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.50s | 885 | 445 | 2,470 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.48s | 11,454 | 655 | 351 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 55.56s | 9,315 | 296 | 637 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.09s | 204 | 3,437 | 1,586 | |
| Seed-2.0-Code | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 10.02s | 182 | 9 | 490 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Seed-2.0-CodelowvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowSeed-2.0-CodelowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighSeed-2.0-CodelowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumSeed-2.0-CodelowvsDeepSeek V4 ProhighClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.8 27BlowClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighSeed-2.0-CodelowvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423highClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsKimi K3maxClaude Sonnet 4.6mediumvsGrok 4.7lowSeed-2.0-CodelowvsGPT-5.6 Terramedium