Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 vs Solar Pro 4 (xhigh)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.5 vs 7.6. Solar Pro 4 (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.050 vs $1.550. Claude Opus 5 is faster at 7.65s vs 134.85s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 60.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-14

Rank
#78
Total Output Tokens
24,866
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$1.550
Rank
#76
Total Output Tokens
389,450
Response Time (avg)
134.85s
Total Cost
$0.050
Recommended model Solar Pro 4 (xhigh)

It has the best score here (7.6), while costing about 31.2x less than Claude Opus 5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 none Release: 2026-07-25 Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 xhigh Release: 2026-08-11
Score 7.5 7.6
Rank #78 #76
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.4
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 60.6%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.912 0.414
Total Cost $1.550 $0.050
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 185,547 98,116
Output Tokens 24,866 21,720
Reasoning Tokens 0 367,730
Response Time (avg) 7.65s 134.85s
Response Time (max) 47.72s 491.42s
Response Time (total) 168.35s 2966.79s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) ~100B
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#78 Claude Opus 5

none
Cost
$0.271
Time
149.3s
Tokens
10,962 tok

#76 Solar Pro 4

xhigh
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 5.9 9.7 33.3% 0 5.54s 10,590 2,886 0
Solar Pro 4 5.8 9.9 33.3% 0 292.21s 7,887 15,575 115,426

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair