Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Summary

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.5-27B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-27B leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.7. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.536 vs $1.270. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 10.83s vs 68.39s, with pass rates of 79.4% vs 73.0%.

Recommended model: Claude Opus 4.8 - Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.9), while responding about 6.3x faster than Qwen3.5-27B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-30

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low Release: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.7 7.9
Rank #38 #29
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 79.4% 73.0%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 8.466 4.901
Total Cost $1.270 $0.536
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 60,946 42,164
Output Tokens 31,771 8,534
Reasoning Tokens 6,831 329,289
Response Time (avg) 10.83s 68.39s
Response Time (max) 127.97s 234.36s
Response Time (total) 227.39s 1436.24s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#38 Claude Opus 4.8

low
Cost
$0.031
Time
14.1s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#29 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.30s 834 793 371
Qwen3.5-27B 8.7 7.9 91.7% 1 19.75s 672 569 31,505
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 7.58s 10,590 3,637 809
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 20.84s 23,500 2,216 1,081
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 163.96s 14,946 483 9,991
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.3 5.8 66.7% 1 2.27s 10,503 310 0
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 30.26s 7,782 270 16,150
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 45.53s 975 23,311 3,908
Qwen3.5-27B 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 79.53s 553 43 52,368
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.55s 708 231 0
Qwen3.5-27B 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 101.41s 524 70 23,147
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 2.78s 909 111 221
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 19.66s 699 97 11,638
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.01s 894 592 184
Qwen3.5-27B 8.2 7.7 77.8% 1 59.60s 696 242 70,096
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 6.85s 11,775 370 35
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.45s 8,193 348 1,323
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 5.48s 258 200 222
Qwen3.5-27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 85.11s 204 31 23,683

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair