Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano

Claude Opus 4.8 (low) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.5. GPT-5.4 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.138 vs $2.077. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) is faster at 12.74s vs 13.24s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.4 Nano (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.5 vs 7.8), while costing about 15.1x less than Claude Opus 4.8 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low Release: 2026-05-28 GPT-5.4 Nano GPT-5.4 Nano medium Release: 2026-03-17
Score 7.8 7.5
Rank #39 #51
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.979 1.150
Total Cost $2.077 $0.138
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 156,525 82,819
Output Tokens 43,141 7,100
Reasoning Tokens 8,617 90,022
Response Time (avg) 12.74s 13.24s
Response Time (max) 127.97s 94.06s
Response Time (total) 280.29s 291.33s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#39 Claude Opus 4.8

low
Cost
$0.031
Time
14.1s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#51 GPT-5.4 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.007
Time
24.6s
Tokens
4,943 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 7.58s 10,590 3,637 809
GPT-5.4 Nano 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 19.12s 7,305 516 20,778

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair