Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Summary

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.6 vs 7.4. Claude Opus 4.7 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.505 vs $0.667. Claude Opus 4.7 is faster at 3.02s vs 18.64s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 98.4%.

Recommended modelGemini 3 Flash Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 none Release: 2026-04-16 Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Release: 2025-12-17
Score 7.4 9.6
Rank #65 #2
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 98.4%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 57 63
Cost per result 3.154 3.335
Total Cost $0.505 $0.667
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 69,576 37,017
Output Tokens 6,265 2,006
Reasoning Tokens 0 214,153
Response Time (avg) 3.02s 18.64s
Response Time (max) 18.27s 117.26s
Response Time (total) 57.44s 391.35s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#65 Claude Opus 4.7

none
Cost
$0.051
Time
24.2s
Tokens
2,181 tok

#2 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

medium
Cost
$0.010
Time
17.9s
Tokens
3,236 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 3.3 3.3 33.3% 0 2.84s 1,176 494 0
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 84.40s 8,122 462 161,084

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair