Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.2 benchmark comparison: The average score is effectively tied at 8.7 vs 8.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.324 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 is faster at 4.73s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 84.1%.

Recommended model: Claude Opus 4.7 - It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 4.9x faster than GLM 5.2.

Last updated at: 2026-06-17

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.7 8.7
Rank #13 #14
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 9.6 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 84.1%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 2.159
Total Cost $0.679 $0.324
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 37,199
Output Tokens 11,858 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 49,500
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 488.94s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#13 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#14 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 1.85s 894 348 0
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.89s 639 497 2,634
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 21.45s 24,501 2,369 1,084
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 51.96s 12,696 458 4,531
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.37s 10,533 324 0
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.44s 7,149 348 2,345
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 1.17s 630 51 0
GLM 5.2 4.1 4.4 44.5% 2 45.47s 551 8,188 11,606
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.87s 723 256 0
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.39s 498 54 1,842
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.57s 939 114 0
GLM 5.2 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 7.90s 678 94 1,518
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 939 370 0
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 13.13s 672 536 4,822
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.17s 15,339 373 0
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 20.41s 6,861 230 550
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.25s 273 24 0
GLM 5.2 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 34.25s 138 381 2,529

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair