Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $1.477. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) is faster at 7.61s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-02

Rank
#21
Total Output Tokens
29,990
Response Time (avg)
7.61s
Total Cost
$1.477
Rank
#49
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.066
Recommended model Claude Opus 4.7 (medium)

It has the best score here (8.7), while responding about 3.1x faster than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.7 7.8
Rank #21 #49
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 9.6 8.0
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 21/22 tests · 63/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 80.3%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 8.201 2.159
Total Cost $1.477 $0.066
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.285 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.894 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 145,252 37,199
Output Tokens 24,948 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 5,042 49,500
Response Time (avg) 7.61s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 65.40s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 159.91s 488.94s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#21 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#49 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair