Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.6. GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.920 vs $3.478. GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) is faster at 16.96s vs 17.20s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 83.3%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.3-Codex (medium)It has the best score here (8.9), while costing about 3.8x less than Claude Fable 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Release: 2026-06-10 GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-5.3-Codex medium Release: 2026-02-05
Score 8.6 8.9
Rank #22 #18
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 83.3%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 20.459 5.748
Total Cost $3.478 $0.920
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,643 81,268
Output Tokens 41,360 6,251
Reasoning Tokens 10,269 49,274
Response Time (avg) 17.20s 16.96s
Response Time (max) 80.80s 100.93s
Response Time (total) 378.41s 373.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Fable 5

medium
Cost
$0.606
Time
156.7s
Tokens
12,264 tok

#18 GPT-5.3-Codex

medium
Cost
$0.049
Time
54.9s
Tokens
3,580 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
GPT-5.3-Codex 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 19.50s 7,302 535 10,890

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair