Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Fable 5.1 (high) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (high)

Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on average score with 9.0 vs 8.9. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $2.736 vs $3.364. Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is faster at 13.59s vs 185.56s, with pass rates of 89.4% vs 86.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-07

Rank
#26
Total Output Tokens
40,071
Response Time (avg)
13.59s
Total Cost
$3.364
Rank
#31
Total Output Tokens
419,443
Response Time (avg)
185.56s
Total Cost
$2.736
Recommended model Claude Fable 5.1 (high)

It has the best score here (9.0), while responding about 13.7x faster than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 high Release: 2026-09-02 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high Release: 2026-09-07
Score 9.0 8.9
Rank #26 #31
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 9.6 9.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 89.4% 86.4%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 17.701 16.089
Total Cost $3.364 $2.736
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,958 109,226
Output Tokens 7,930 6,890
Reasoning Tokens 32,141 412,553
Response Time (avg) 13.59s 185.56s
Response Time (max) 40.17s 912.78s
Response Time (total) 298.90s 4082.41s
Parameters ~9.5T total (~878B active) 2.4T total (~100B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#26 Claude Fable 5.1

high
Cost
$0.384
Time
102.5s
Tokens
7,824 tok

#31 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5.1 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 13.91s 10,608 520 6,503
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 253.22s 8,235 418 91,734

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-5.3-CodexmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 MaxmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumGPT-5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Fable 5.1highvsSeed 2.1 TurbolowClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.8 FlashmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)high