Tool Calling Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Tool Calling, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Tool Calling Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #186 | Dots 3 Note Preview high | Dots Studio | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 6.96s |
| #187 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.044 | 1/1 | 6.64s |
| #188 | MiMo-V2.5 medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.104 | 1/1 | 7.29s |
| #189 | Ling-3.0-flash high | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.021 | 1/1 | 6.47s |
| #190 | Ring-2.6-1T medium | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.102 | 1/1 | 104.4s |
| #191 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.333 | 1/1 | 8.19s |
| #192 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.043 | 1/1 | 27.8s |
| #193 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 1/1 | 3.94s |
| #195 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.051 | 1/1 | 4.43s |
| #196 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.548 | 1/1 | 6.80s |
| #197 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 1/1 | 3.51s | |
| #198 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $1.172 | 1/1 | 4.65s |
| #199 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 9.8 | 6.1 | $0.070 | 1/1 | 6.91s |
| #200 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 1/1 | 2.80s |
| #201 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 1/1 | 2.97s |