Tool Calling Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Tool Calling, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Score ↑.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Tool Calling Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #330 | LFM2-24B-A2B none | Liquid | 3.0 | 2.2 | $0.001 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #329 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 3.0 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #328 | Jev 1.13 none | Typesafe | 0.0 | 3.2 | $0.003 | 0/0 | 0ms |
| #327 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 3.0 | 3.2 | $0.000 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #326 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning medium | NVIDIA | 3.0 | 3.4 | $0.000 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #325 | gpt-oss-120b none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 3.7 | $0.033 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #324 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.004 | 0/1 | 1.93s |
| #323 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 4.91s |
| #322 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.062 | 1/1 | 4.31s |
| #321 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 2.8 | 3.8 | $0.008 | 0/1 | 5.51s |
| #320 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 5.94s |
| #319 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 5.76s |
| #318 | Mercury 2.5 none | Inception | 10.0 | 3.9 | $0.016 | 1/1 | 1.23s |
| #317 | Grok Build 0.1 none | X AI | 3.0 | 4.0 | $0.547 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #316 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning none | NVIDIA | 2.8 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/1 | 1.70s |