Tool Calling Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Tool Calling, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Tool Calling Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #317 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.4 | $0.009 | 1/1 | 7.54s |
| #319 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 4.3 | $0.168 | 1/1 | 15.9s |
| #321 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 4.3 | $0.037 | 1/1 | 1.39s |
| #322 | Hunter Alpha none | OpenRouter | 10.0 | 4.2 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 6.02s |
| #323 | Grok 4.20 none | X AI | 10.0 | 4.1 | $0.057 | 1/1 | 4.63s |
| #325 | Hy3 preview none | Tencent | 10.0 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 1/1 | 33.8s |
| #326 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 1/1 | 2.28s |
| #328 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 10.0 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 1/1 | 2.17s |
| #331 | Mercury 2.5 none | Inception | 10.0 | 3.9 | $0.016 | 1/1 | 1.23s |
| #332 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 5.76s |
| #333 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 5.94s |
| #335 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.062 | 1/1 | 4.31s |
| #336 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 3.8 | $0.000 | 1/1 | 4.91s |