Tool Calling Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Tool Calling, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Tool Calling Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #190 | Ring-2.6-1T medium | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.102 | 1/1 | 104.4s |
| #191 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.333 | 1/1 | 8.19s |
| #192 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.043 | 1/1 | 27.8s |
| #193 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 1/1 | 3.94s |
| #195 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.051 | 1/1 | 4.43s |
| #196 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.548 | 1/1 | 6.80s |
| #197 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 1/1 | 3.51s | |
| #198 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $1.172 | 1/1 | 4.65s |
| #199 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 9.8 | 6.1 | $0.070 | 1/1 | 6.91s |
| #200 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 1/1 | 2.80s |
| #201 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 1/1 | 2.97s | |
| #202 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.142 | 1/1 | 10.3s |
| #204 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.756 | 1/1 | 5.26s |
| #205 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.062 | 1/1 | 2.49s |
| #207 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.122 | 1/1 | 4.42s |