- Score
- 9.4 (+0.76 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 94.7% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 32.7% faster
Anthropic
Release: 2026-11-09
Tested on: 2026-11-10 00:33
anthropic/claude-fable-5.2::low
~9.5T total (~878B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Claude Fable 5.2 scores 8.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #92. It has 9.6 reliability, a 84.1% pass rate, $3.471 total cost, and 9.28s average response time.
What makes Claude Fable 5.2 unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #16.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.9 (+0.27 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 98.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 5.30s · 42.9% faster
- Score
- 8.6 (+0.00 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.184 · 94.7% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 4.08s · 56.1% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-11-09
- Parameters
- ~9.5T total (~878B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. API-only exact checkpoint (claude-fable-5-2). Anthropic does not disclose parameter counts or architecture; the low-confidence estimates follow the Claude Fable 5.1 family record.
8.6
Consistency
9.6
9.6
$3.471
Total Output Tokens
26,679
Total Input Tokens
300,393
Input Price
$8.000 / 1M
Output Price
$40.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.200 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$10.000 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#92 Claude Fable 5.2
low- Cost
- $0.084
- Time
- 21.6s
- Tokens
- 2,240 tok
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Claude Fable 5.2lowvsMuse Spark 1.1lowClaude Fable 5.2lowvsClaude Sonnet 5.5highClaude Fable 5.2lowvsGPT-6.1 TerranoneClaude Fable 5.2lowvsClaude Haiku 5.5lowClaude Fable 5.2lowvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxClaude Fable 5.2lowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Fable 5.2lowvsMuse EmbermaxClaude Fable 5.2lowvsParticle-1mediumClaude Fable 5.2lowvsMuse EmberlowClaude Fable 5.2lowvsMuse Embermedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 5.8 | 9.9 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 2.8 | 1.6 |