Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #189 | GLM 5.3 FlashX medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.114 | 2/2 | 1.51s |
| #295 | Inkling Small medium | Thinkingmachines | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.113 | 1/2 | 3.78s |
| #380 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.111 | 1/2 | 87.5s |
| #386 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.108 | 0/2 | 423ms |
| #408 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.106 | 1/2 | 5.75s |
| #454 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview high | 0.0 | 0.2 | $0.105 | 0/0 | 0ms | |
| #337 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 0.8 | 0.5 | $0.105 | 1/2 | 4.78s |
| #345 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.105 | 1/2 | 1.86s |
| #260 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.104 | 1/2 | 2.82s |
| #309 | Ring 2.6 1t medium | Inclusionai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.102 | 2/2 | 11.8s |
| #169 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 2/2 | 17.5s | |
| #220 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 1/2 | 56.4s |
| #250 | Solar Pro 4 medium | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.098 | 2/2 | 40.1s |
| #358 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.092 | 0/2 | 400ms |
| #280 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.090 | 2/2 | 1.13s |