Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #321 | GLM 5 none | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.140 | 2/2 | 1.48s |
| #124 | GPT-5.6 Terra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.435 | 2/2 | 1.48s |
| #264 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.736 | 2/2 | 1.49s | |
| #355 | KAT Coder AIR V2.5 medium | Kwaipilot | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.048 | 2/2 | 1.50s |
| #349 | KAT Coder AIR V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.077 | 2/2 | 1.51s |
| #189 | GLM 5.3 FlashX medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.114 | 2/2 | 1.51s |
| #233 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.478 | 2/2 | 1.52s |
| #382 | DeepSeek V3.2 none | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.119 | 2/2 | 1.52s |
| #266 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.717 | 2/2 | 1.52s | |
| #116 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $3.636 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #248 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.155 | 1/2 | 1.58s | |
| #185 | Step 3.7 Flash low | Stepfun | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.449 | 2/2 | 1.58s |
| #359 | Mercury 2.5 Preview low | Inception | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.015 | 1/2 | 1.60s |
| #190 | Minimax M3.1 Flash low | Minimax | 0.6 | 0.7 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.60s |
| #325 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.486 | 1/2 | 1.64s |