Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #37 | Muse Wonder medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $3.397 | 1/2 | 3.88s |
| #39 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 max | Anthropic | 0.9 | 0.9 | $8.557 | 1/2 | 6.24s |
| #45 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.891 | 1/2 | 14.7s |
| #46 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 1/2 | 2.08s |
| #49 | Muse Wonder minimal | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.639 | 1/2 | 1.39s |
| #59 | Muse Spark Open low | Meta | 0.8 | 0.9 | $0.600 | 1/2 | 10.3s |
| #62 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.665 | 1/2 | 6.31s |
| #68 | Muse Spark Open medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.260 | 1/2 | 18.4s |
| #75 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 0.8 | 0.9 | $0.586 | 1/2 | 1.79s |
| #80 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 1/2 | 5.42s |
| #90 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL high | NVIDIA | 0.8 | 0.8 | $0.349 | 1/2 | 6.10s |
| #93 | Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh | Meta | 0.8 | 0.8 | $0.585 | 1/2 | 8.90s |
| #96 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 0.6 | 0.8 | $2.570 | 1/2 | 7.81s |
| #115 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 high | DeepSeek | 0.8 | 0.8 | $0.149 | 1/2 | 8.73s |
| #133 | Muse Wonder max | Meta | 0.8 | 0.8 | $4.766 | 1/2 | 13.2s |