AI BENCHY Category
Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #23 | MiMo-V2-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 9.9 | 8.1 | 2/2 | 3.36s |
| #31 | GLM 5V Turbo medium | Z.ai | 9.9 | 7.8 | 2/2 | 3.74s |
| #40 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 7.5 | 2/2 | 3.12s |
| #50 | Hunter Alpha medium | OpenRouter | 9.9 | 6.7 | 2/2 | 4.18s |
| #68 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 9.9 | 5.8 | 2/2 | 7.63s |
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 10.0 | 2/2 | 6.10s | |
| #2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.6 | 2/2 | 9.56s | |
| #3 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #4 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #6 | Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 7.26s |
| #7 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.6 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #8 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 31.9s |
| #9 | Qwen3.6 Plus Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 2/2 | 7.54s |
| #10 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 19.7s |
| #13 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.4 | 2/2 | 7.25s |