Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #42 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $3.306 | 2/2 | 7.55s |
| #43 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.318 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #44 | Claude Haiku 5.5 xhigh | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.140 | 2/2 | 3.34s |
| #47 | Pareto default | Unbiased | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.520 | 2/2 | 4.95s |
| #48 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.892 | 2/2 | 7.66s |
| #50 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 2/2 | 23.5s |
| #51 | Gemini 3.5 Flash low | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.752 | 2/2 | 1.86s | |
| #52 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.096 | 2/2 | 4.24s |
| #53 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.712 | 2/2 | 10.5s |
| #54 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite high | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.624 | 2/2 | 2.16s | |
| #55 | Gemini 4 Argon medium | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.674 | 2/2 | 2.71s | |
| #56 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.350 | 2/2 | 4.13s |
| #57 | Gemini 3.6 Flash low | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.363 | 2/2 | 2.82s | |
| #58 | GLM 5.3 Flash max | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.089 | 2/2 | 3.65s |
| #60 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 2/2 | 5.43s |