Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #141 | Hy3 preview high | Tencent | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.048 | 2/2 | 34.4s |
| #80 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.078 | 2/2 | 35.8s |
| #105 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.779 | 2/2 | 38.0s |
| #120 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.139 | 2/2 | 63.5s |
| #169 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 9.8 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 64.0s | |
| #81 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.600 | 2/2 | 92.5s |