Instructions following Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Instructions following, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
461/461
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Instructions following Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #195 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.158 | 2/2 | 1.91s | |
| #208 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 low | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.7 | $0.909 | 1/2 | 1.91s |
| #262 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.148 | 1/2 | 1.92s |
| #144 | GPT-6 Luna high | OpenAI | 0.8 | 0.8 | $0.074 | 1/2 | 1.92s |
| #292 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.661 | 1/2 | 1.96s |
| #143 | Muse Wonder high | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $3.426 | 1/2 | 1.97s |
| #385 | GLM 5V Turbo none | Z.ai | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.052 | 1/2 | 1.97s |
| #243 | GLM 5.1 none | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.451 | 2/2 | 1.98s |
| #20 | GPT-6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.703 | 2/2 | 2.00s |
| #207 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.049 | 1/2 | 2.04s |
| #155 | Space Bunny Alpha high | Stealth | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 2.04s |
| #152 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | ~$0.047 | 2/2 | 2.04s |
| #170 | GLM 5.3 Flash high | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.056 | 2/2 | 2.06s |
| #46 | Muse Wonder low | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $2.637 | 1/2 | 2.08s |
| #128 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.102 | 2/2 | 2.13s |