AI BENCHY
Compare Charts Methodology
❤️ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Category

Domain specific Ranking

See which AI models perform best on Domain specific, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear.

Models Shown

55

Average Domain specific Score

6.4

Rank Model Company Domain specific Score Avg Score Tests Correct Response Time (avg)
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 3/3 21.1s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 0/3 63.4s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 0/3 0ms
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 0/3 4.21s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 10.0 7.4 0/3 0ms
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.3 0/3 13.0s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 6.9 0/3 0ms
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 0/3 83.4s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 10.0 6.4 0/3 137.3s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 0/3 2.24s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 10.0 6.0 0/3 44.6s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 0/3 1.61s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 0/3 88.3s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 10.0 5.3 0/3 6.48s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 10.0 5.1 0/3 50.9s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 10.0 4.9 0/3 540ms
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 10.0 4.7 0/3 237.3s
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 10.0 4.0 0/3 637ms
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 0/3 174.6s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 7.0 9.4 2/3 32.7s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 7.0 7.2 2/3 963ms
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 7.0 6.8 2/3 3.54s
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 7.0 5.2 2/3 905ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 7.0 4.7 2/3 485ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 7.0 3.9 2/3 744ms
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 4.0 8.4 1/3 64.3s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 4.0 8.3 1/3 17.5s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 8.05s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 7.01s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 4.0 8.2 1/3 79.5s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 4.0 8.2 1/3 127.6s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 4.0 8.0 1/3 74.3s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 4.0 7.4 1/3 170.5s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.4 1/3 17.8s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4.0 7.4 1/3 37.3s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 4.0 7.3 1/3 2.36s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 4.0 7.3 1/3 39.3s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 4.0 7.2 1/3 96.0s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 4.0 7.1 1/3 942ms
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 4.0 6.9 1/3 146.5s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 4.0 6.5 1/3 77.8s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 4.0 6.2 1/3 1.17s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 4.0 6.2 1/3 121.8s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 4.0 5.5 1/3 204.0s
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 4.0 5.2 1/3 495ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 4.0 5.0 1/3 465ms
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 4.0 4.5 1/3 1.07s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 4.0 4.2 1/3 877ms
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 4.0 4.1 1/3 4.38s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 4.0 4.0 1/3 962ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 4.0 3.5 1/3 638ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 4.0 3.4 1/3 534ms
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 4.0 2.9 1/3 1.06s
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 4.0 2.9 1/3 564ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 4.0 2.6 1/3 287ms

Top Models by Domain specific Score

Domain specific Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)