AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
8.7
Best Model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 10.0| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #145 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.8 | 2/2 | 3.37s |
| #146 | Laguna Xs.2 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.8 | 2/2 | 646ms |
| #147 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 4.8 | 2/2 | 1.27s |
| #151 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 10.0 | 4.6 | 2/2 | 3.26s |
| #153 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.6 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #154 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.6 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #157 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 10.0 | 4.4 | 2/2 | 943ms |
| #159 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 4.3 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #10 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 7.1 | 8.7 | 1/2 | 12.3s |
| #17 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 7.1 | 8.3 | 1/2 | 8.90s |
| #20 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 6.5 | 8.1 | 1/2 | 8.10s | |
| #33 | Hy3 preview medium | Tencent | 6.5 | 7.7 | 1/2 | 5.25s |
| #43 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 7.5 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #49 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 7.3 | 7.4 | 1/2 | 57.0s |
| #51 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 7.4 | 1/2 | 17.2s |