Data parsing and extraction Model Ranking

AI BENCHY Category

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.

Models Shown

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

8.7

Best Model

Qwen3.5-9B 3.6

Failure Reasons

With failure reason Wrong answer35 With failure reason API error16 With failure reason No answer5 With failure reason Extra formatting4 With failure reason Timed out1

Rank	Model	Company	Data parsing and extraction Score	Score	Tests Correct	Response Time (avg)
#40	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium	Google	10.0	7.5	2/2	2.29s
#57	Step 3.7 Flash low	Stepfun	7.3	7.3	1/2	2.29s
#85	Gemma 4 31B none	Google	10.0	6.5	2/2	2.25s
#63	GPT-5.3 Chat none	OpenAI	10.0	7.2	2/2	2.21s
#8	Claude Opus 4.7 none	Anthropic	10.0	8.9	2/2	2.15s
#128	Qwen3.6 Flash none	Qwen	10.0	5.4	2/2	2.13s
#118	Qwen3.6 27B none	Qwen	7.3	5.6	1/2	2.06s
#99	gpt-oss-120b medium	OpenAI	6.4	6.1	1/2	1.98s
#104	Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55b none	NVIDIA	10.0	6.0	2/2	1.94s
#95	Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none	Qwen	10.0	6.3	2/2	1.89s
#110	Seed-2.0-Lite none	Bytedance Seed	10.0	5.8	2/2	1.82s
#3	Gemini 3.5 Flash low	Google	10.0	9.4	2/2	1.81s
#68	Claude Opus 4.8 none	Anthropic	7.3	7.0	1/2	1.77s
#101	Mimo V2 Omni none	Xiaomi	10.0	6.0	2/2	1.76s
#102	Gemma 4 26B A4B none	Google	10.0	6.0	2/2	1.70s

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)