Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
8.9
Best Model
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta 10.0
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #34 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.604 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #81 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.600 | 2/2 | 49.8s |
| #31 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.584 | 2/2 | 2.71s | |
| #58 | GPT-5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.571 | 2/2 | 2.21s |
| #118 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.548 | 2/2 | 3.01s |
| #208 | Grok Build 0.1 none | X AI | 3.8 | 4.0 | $0.547 | 0/2 | 9.33s |
| #91 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.544 | 2/2 | 1.18s |
| #78 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 7.1 | $0.535 | 2/2 | 9.33s |
| #87 | GPT-5.6 Sol none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.524 | 2/2 | 1.53s |
| #59 | GPT-5.6 Terra low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.519 | 2/2 | 919ms |
| #6 | Gemini 3.6 Flash low | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.517 | 2/2 | 1.48s | |
| #33 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.515 | 2/2 | 2.75s |
| #99 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.505 | 2/2 | 2.15s |
| #73 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 10.0 | 7.2 | $0.482 | 2/2 | 4.13s |
| #64 | LongCat 2.0 medium | Meituan | 6.3 | 7.4 | $0.478 | 1/2 | 10.6s |