Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #96 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 20.1s |
| #73 | Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh | Meta | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.510 | 2/2 | 19.8s |
| #326 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 2.9 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 19.7s |
| #148 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.741 | 2/2 | 19.0s |
| #170 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.8 | $0.221 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #164 | Seed-2.0-Code medium | Bytedance Seed | 7.3 | 6.8 | $1.153 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #239 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 18.2s |
| #310 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 6.3 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 17.4s |
| #201 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.3 | $0.333 | 1/2 | 17.2s |
| #83 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 7.3 | 7.9 | $3.467 | 1/2 | 16.7s |
| #173 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.084 | 2/2 | 16.5s | |
| #216 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 6.3 | 6.1 | $0.756 | 1/2 | 16.4s |
| #31 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.9 | $2.736 | 2/2 | 16.4s |
| #17 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.908 | 2/2 | 16.1s |
| #141 | Qwen3.7 Flash low | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.2 | $0.043 | 2/2 | 15.4s |