Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
8.9
Best Model
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta 10.0
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #62 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $1.627 | 2/2 | 30.3s |
| #21 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.533 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #18 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.477 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #10 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.361 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #19 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.357 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #7 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $1.316 | 2/2 | 1.38s |
| #9 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.253 | 2/2 | 3.28s |
| #8 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.4 | $1.234 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #90 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.9 | $1.207 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #70 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 7.3 | 7.3 | $1.166 | 1/2 | 1.77s |
| #22 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.143 | 2/2 | 41.2s |
| #11 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.116 | 2/2 | 8.80s |
| #52 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.6 | $1.097 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #83 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 6.5 | 7.0 | $1.079 | 1/2 | 8.10s | |
| #38 | GPT-5.6 Terra high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.0 | $1.055 | 2/2 | 938ms |