Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↓.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #317 | Laguna M.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.4 | $0.009 | 2/2 | 3.37s |
| #5 | GPT-6 Astra xhigh | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.9 | $5.156 | 2/2 | 3.34s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.7 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.4 | $0.309 | 2/2 | 3.33s | |
| #16 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.257 | 2/2 | 3.28s |
| #306 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 10.0 | 4.8 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 3.26s |
| #66 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.673 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #39 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite high | 10.0 | 8.8 | $0.540 | 2/2 | 3.17s | |
| #70 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.16s |
| #59 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.182 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #262 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash none | DeepSeek | 6.5 | 5.4 | $0.185 | 1/2 | 3.09s |
| #147 | Mercury 2.5 high | Inception | 10.0 | 7.1 | $0.031 | 2/2 | 3.08s |
| #32 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.988 | 2/2 | 3.07s |
| #84 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #231 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.683 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #208 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.548 | 2/2 | 3.01s |