Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
8.8
Best Model
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta 10.0
316/316
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #266 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.0 | $0.082 | 2/2 | 2.76s |
| #133 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.078 | 2/2 | 36.1s |
| #225 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high | Kwaipilot | 6.5 | 5.6 | $0.077 | 1/2 | 3.59s |
| #206 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.076 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #205 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #169 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.89s |
| #108 | GPT-5.6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.072 | 2/2 | 1.95s |
| #74 | Qwen3.8 27B low | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.9 | ~$0.071 | 2/2 | 8.03s |
| #279 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 none | Kwaipilot | 6.3 | 4.8 | $0.070 | 1/2 | 2.66s |
| #283 | Grok 4.1 Fast medium | X AI | 10.0 | 4.7 | $0.069 | 2/2 | 6.63s |
| #242 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.068 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #171 | Laguna XS 2.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.068 | 2/2 | 4.50s |
| #119 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.066 | 2/2 | 5.21s |
| #183 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #142 | Qwen3.7 Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.9 | $0.065 | 2/2 | 15.4s |