AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Category

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.

Models Shown

15

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

8.7

Rank Model Company Data parsing and extraction Score Score Tests Correct Response Time (avg)
#64 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 6.5 7.2 1/2 0ms
#83 Step 3.5 Flash none Stepfun 3.0 6.6 0/1 0ms
#127 Grok 4.20 none X AI 10.0 5.4 2/2 522ms
#163 Granite 4.1 8B none IBM Granite 3.0 4.0 0/2 575ms
#106 Grok 4.20 Beta none X AI 10.0 5.8 2/2 601ms
#146 Laguna Xs.2 none Poolside 10.0 4.8 2/2 646ms
#97 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 10.0 6.2 2/2 652ms
#155 Mercury 2 none Inception 7.3 4.5 1/2 667ms
#160 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 3.0 4.2 0/2 714ms
#142 Mistral Small 4 none Mistral 10.0 4.9 2/2 822ms
#90 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none Google 10.0 6.4 2/2 843ms
#154 Qwen3.5-9B none Qwen 10.0 4.6 2/2 847ms
#157 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 10.0 4.4 2/2 943ms
#136 Elephant Alpha medium Openrouter 6.5 5.1 1/2 979ms
#131 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 10.0 5.3 2/2 1.01s

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)