Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #172 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.085 | 2/2 | 1.41s | |
| #340 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning none | NVIDIA | 3.8 | 3.2 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 1.42s |
| #182 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.058 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #134 | Qwen3.7 Plus none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.106 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #278 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 6.5 | 5.2 | $0.008 | 1/2 | 1.43s |
| #185 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.621 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #275 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.061 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #319 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 6.3 | 4.3 | $0.168 | 1/2 | 1.51s |
| #102 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash low | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.174 | 2/2 | 1.51s |
| #149 | GPT-5.6 Sol none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.201 | 2/2 | 1.53s |
| #227 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.0 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #203 | GLM 5.3 FlashX low | Z.ai | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.090 | 2/2 | 1.59s |
| #177 | Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.300 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #42 | Gemini 3.6 Flash low | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.251 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #250 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.017 | 2/2 | 1.70s |