Data parsing and extraction Model Ranking

AI BENCHY Category

See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.

Models Shown

Average Data parsing and extraction Score

9.0

Best Model

MiMo-V2-Flash 6.5

Failure Reasons

With failure reason Wrong answer19 With failure reason API error6 With failure reason Extra formatting2 With failure reason No answer2 With failure reason Timed out1

Rank	Model	Company	Data parsing and extraction Score	Score	Tests Correct	Response Time (avg)
#11	Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high	Google	10.0	8.4	2/2	7.16s
#37	Claude Opus 4.6 medium	Anthropic	10.0	7.6	2/2	7.37s
#71	MiniMax M2.5 medium	Minimax	4.6	5.7	0/2	7.48s
#2	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium	Google	10.0	9.6	2/2	7.72s
#88	Nemotron 3 Super none	NVIDIA	10.0	5.1	2/2	7.92s
#72	Hunter Alpha none	OpenRouter	10.0	5.7	2/2	8.49s
#13	GLM 5 medium	Z.ai	7.1	8.4	1/2	8.90s
#6	Seed-2.0-Lite medium	Bytedance Seed	10.0	8.6	2/2	9.07s
#33	GLM 5.1 medium	Z.ai	10.0	7.8	2/2	9.33s
#5	Gemini 3 Flash Preview low	Google	10.0	8.8	2/2	9.40s
#64	DeepSeek V3.2 none	DeepSeek	6.3	6.1	1/2	9.42s
#31	GLM 5V Turbo medium	Z.ai	10.0	7.8	2/2	9.60s
#12	Gemini 3 PRO Preview medium	Google	10.0	8.4	2/2	10.8s
#45	GPT-5 Mini medium	OpenAI	10.0	7.0	2/2	12.6s
#26	Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium	Anthropic	10.0	8.0	2/2	13.9s

←

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

→

Data parsing and extraction Ranking

Top Models by Data parsing and extraction Score

Data parsing and extraction Score vs Total Cost

Top Models by Response Time (avg)