Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #122 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.066 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #5 | GPT-5.6 Sol low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.5 | $0.971 | 2/2 | 1.82s |
| #113 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.89s |
| #135 | Nemotron 3 Ultra none | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.095 | 2/2 | 1.94s |
| #54 | GPT-5.6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.352 | 2/2 | 1.95s |
| #127 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 6.4 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 1/2 | 1.98s |
| #158 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 7.3 | 5.5 | $0.087 | 1/2 | 2.06s |
| #129 | Inkling low | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.187 | 2/2 | 2.07s |
| #130 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.1 | $0.062 | 2/2 | 2.13s |
| #123 | GPT-5.6 Luna low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.249 | 2/2 | 2.14s |
| #99 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.505 | 2/2 | 2.15s |
| #48 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.7 | $1.017 | 2/2 | 2.18s |
| #58 | GPT-5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.571 | 2/2 | 2.21s |
| #121 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #45 | Claude Opus 4.8 low | Anthropic | 6.3 | 7.8 | $2.077 | 1/2 | 2.27s |