Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
216/216
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #106 | Hy3 preview medium | Tencent | 6.5 | 6.5 | $0.018 | 1/2 | 5.25s |
| #127 | gpt-oss-120b medium | OpenAI | 6.4 | 6.1 | $0.019 | 1/2 | 1.98s |
| #215 | Step 3.5 Flash none | Stepfun | 1.5 | 2.3 | $0.020 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #121 | Gemma 4 31B none | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 2.25s | |
| #175 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #163 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 1.76s |
| #171 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 822ms |
| #172 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 1/2 | 1.32s |
| #206 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 2.9 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 19.7s |
| #174 | MiMo-V2.5 none | Xiaomi | 6.5 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 1/2 | 1.01s |
| #185 | Ring-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.026 | 0/2 | 45.9s |
| #195 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 7.3 | 4.6 | $0.030 | 1/2 | 667ms |
| #193 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 6.5 | 4.7 | $0.032 | 1/2 | 81.8s |
| #192 | Laguna M.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 4.7 | $0.033 | 2/2 | 4.93s |
| #210 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 3.6 | 3.8 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 87.3s |