Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
451/451
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #66 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.558 | 2/2 | 3.15s |
| #86 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.585 | 2/2 | 7.72s | |
| #56 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.590 | 2/2 | 6.42s |
| #201 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.594 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #22 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.595 | 2/2 | 1.16s |
| #44 | Muse Wonder minimal | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.639 | 2/2 | 3.31s |
| #29 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.645 | 2/2 | 34.5s |
| #57 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.665 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #80 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.689 | 2/2 | 8.80s |
| #20 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.700 | 2/2 | 1.38s |
| #48 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.712 | 2/2 | 8.75s |
| #24 | Claude Opus 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.733 | 2/2 | 12.0s |
| #273 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 0.7 | 0.6 | $1.752 | 1/2 | 8.10s | |
| #30 | Muse Spark Open high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.782 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #17 | Gemini 4 Argon high | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.802 | 2/2 | 8.04s |