Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
451/451
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #15 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.876 | 2/2 | 5.43s | |
| #105 | Seed-2.0-Code low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 24.9s |
| #65 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #72 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #1 | Gemini 3.6 Flash high | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.900 | 2/2 | 6.44s | |
| #199 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.909 | 2/2 | 2.31s |
| #78 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.911 | 2/2 | 3.62s |
| #264 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.918 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #3 | GPT-6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.921 | 2/2 | 2.26s |
| #236 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.989 | 2/2 | 19.0s |
| #4 | GPT-6.1 Sol max | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.006 | 2/2 | 4.97s |
| #102 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.007 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #177 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 0/2 | 37.3s |
| #60 | Qwen3.8 MAX low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.089 | 2/2 | 7.87s |
| #292 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $1.095 | 2/2 | 3.01s |