Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #191 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.138 | 2/2 | 859ms | |
| #192 | Qwen3.5-27B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.058 | 2/2 | 1.43s |
| #193 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.646 | 2/2 | 3.00s | |
| #194 | Inkling Small medium | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.113 | 2/2 | 3.95s |
| #195 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.621 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #196 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.750 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #197 | Mercury 2.5 Preview high | Inception | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.030 | 2/2 | 2.24s |
| #198 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.073 | 2/2 | 1.89s |
| #200 | Laguna XS 2.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 6.5 | $0.068 | 2/2 | 4.50s |
| #202 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #203 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview none | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.228 | 2/2 | 2.87s |
| #206 | GLM 5.3 FlashX medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.056 | 2/2 | 1.74s |
| #207 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 10.0 | 6.4 | $0.044 | 2/2 | 2.36s |
| #213 | GLM 5.3 FlashX low | Z.ai | 10.0 | 6.3 | $0.090 | 2/2 | 1.59s |
| #214 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.122 | 2/2 | 1.05s |