Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #225 | Owl Alpha none | Openrouter | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 3.60s |
| #232 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.5 | $0.021 | 2/2 | 1.76s |
| #234 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.053 | 2/2 | 2.42s |
| #236 | GPT-5.6 Luna none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.029 | 2/2 | 758ms |
| #237 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.068 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #239 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 none | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.011 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #240 | Laguna S 2.1 high | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.4 | $0.114 | 2/2 | 1.96s |
| #241 | Inkling Small none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 782ms |
| #242 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.008 | 2/2 | 768ms |
| #244 | Ling-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.016 | 2/2 | 1.37s |
| #245 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 10.0 | 5.3 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 7.16s | |
| #246 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.3 | $0.051 | 2/2 | 1.46s |
| #247 | Dots 3 Note Preview none | Dots Studio | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 2.72s |
| #248 | Inkling none | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.2 | $0.147 | 2/2 | 1.14s |
| #251 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.1 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 822ms |