Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #170 | Seed-2.0-Code high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 6.9 | $1.273 | 2/2 | 24.3s |
| #172 | Qwen3.6 Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.741 | 2/2 | 9.65s |
| #173 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 10.0 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 2/2 | 14.7s |
| #176 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.130 | 2/2 | 62.4s |
| #177 | Solar Pro 4 medium | Upstage | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.140 | 2/2 | 43.1s |
| #178 | DeepSeek V4 Pro none | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.210 | 2/2 | 4.61s |
| #179 | GLM 5.3 low | Z.ai | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.154 | 2/2 | 3.42s |
| #181 | Mercury 2.5 medium | Inception | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.022 | 2/2 | 2.57s |
| #182 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.085 | 2/2 | 1.41s | |
| #183 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.084 | 2/2 | 16.5s | |
| #184 | GLM 5.2 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.103 | 2/2 | 7.17s |
| #185 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none | Kwaipilot | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.487 | 2/2 | 5.07s |
| #187 | Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.300 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #188 | GLM 5V Turbo medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.457 | 2/2 | 9.60s |
| #190 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.505 | 2/2 | 2.15s |